Page 1 of 2
FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 25 Aug 2011 01:07
by jgodfrey
I'm attempting to set up a FORTRAN syntax file (yeah, I know...
), but am struggling with the column-specific nature of the language.
For instance, in F77, a comment is denoted by either a "C" or an asterisk, but it must specifically be in column 1. Currently, I don't see any way to do that in a syntax definition. I can define the "C" character, and say that it must be the first non-white space character in the line, but then the highlighter thinks the following legitimate code is a comment:
because the first non-whitespace character is a "C".
Are there any tricks for accomplishing this?
Jeff
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 25 Aug 2011 08:56
by pjj
jgodfrey wrote:I'm attempting to set up a FORTRAN syntax file (yeah, I know...
)
Fortran! I first programmed in Fortran, some 25 years ago! We used special sheets to write our (very simple) code, which werre subsequently "compiled" on special perforated cards...
Ahh, memories.
Anyway, Rickard, for some time I've been thinking about similar feature request: similar in the sense that I was going to ask for a support for a very, err, unorthodox file format, namely YAML:
http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html Thing is, it has no keywords, just structure (roughly speaking, it is supposed to be a substitute for XML, but better human-readable and easier maintainable). As you can see from samples on the website, it has no tags, or, should I say, its tags have no braces. I haven't attempted to define a syntax file for YAML, but something is telling me that it would be impossible within current specifications, due to the very fluid YAML form. I am writing this because maybe you would need to find completely new way to ensure support for Fortran language (a plugin rather than massive rework of the current code) and if there are more than just one reason to take it into consideration (now it would be two
) you would be more inclined to give it some thought?
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 14:52
by Rickard Johansson
The syntax option "OnlyLineCommentIfFirstChar" can now have 3 values in v7.63.
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstChar=2 means the line comment start character has to be the first character on the line.
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 14:56
by Rickard Johansson
YAML highlighting may be difficult to accomplice. Using external highlighters is probably not an option. Any external script need an API to work with and that API just doesn't exist.
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 15:12
by jgodfrey
Rickard Johansson wrote:The syntax option "OnlyLineCommentIfFirstChar" can now have 3 values in v7.63.
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstChar=2 means the line comment start character has to be the first character on the line.
Thanks!
I wonder though, with the addition of regex definitions, (my other related post) would I also be able to define my comment character as:
Jeff
Edit: Reading your other post, I think regex only applies to keywords, correct? So, I guess the above won't work. Though regex would be a nice addition to other areas of syntax definitions...
Edit 2: For instance, the Fortran continuation character can be any character, but must appear in column 6. With regex, I could define that as:
... or whatever list of chars I wanted...
Edit 3: And, I could define the opening fold character for Tcl as:
That would resolve this item I think -
http://www.rjsoftware.se/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1813
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 15:29
by jgodfrey
Rickard,
I added an "Edit" "Edit 2" and "Edit 3" section in my above post in case you missed them.
Jeff
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 16:47
by Rickard Johansson
Using regular expressions for code folding may seem like a good idea, but it actually doesn't help that much. You still need to match the { } characters to find the correct fold ending. So you still need to know the fold start "{" in plain text to match it properly.
It might be helpful with blocks though.
I'll add some more in v7.70.
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 16:57
by pjj
Rickard Johansson wrote:YAML highlighting may be difficult to accomplice.
Yes, I'm afraid it would require a kind of separate module to do just that.
Rickard Johansson wrote:Using external highlighters is probably not an option.
I pondered a bit about it and came to the same conclusion. They're just highlighters, and have no information about folding. Then, licensing issue comes up...
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 00:02
by jgodfrey
Rickard Johansson wrote:The syntax option "OnlyLineCommentIfFirstChar" can now have 3 values in v7.63.
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstChar=2 means the line comment start character has to be the first character on the line.
Rickard,
I just tried this, and it works (mostly) as expected. However, this doesn't work properly:
Code: Select all
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
C SOME DESCRIPTIVE TEXT
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Above, the 1st and 3rd lines aren't highlighted as comments, though I'd expect them to be. It seems that the "C" must be followed by a space (or a word delimiter) in order to be seen as a comment. If I include a space as the 2nd character on lines 1 and 3 above, they highlight correctly.
Jeff
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 14:37
by Rickard Johansson
It seems to work on my end using
LineCommentA=C
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstCharA=2
Could you recheck?
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 14:53
by jgodfrey
Rickard Johansson wrote:It seems to work on my end using
LineCommentA=C
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstCharA=2
Could you recheck?
Hmmm... It doesn't seem to work here. Using this syntax definition:
Code: Select all
;{}
[Keywords]
Keywords=allocatable|allocate|assign|backspace|block data|call|case|character|close|common|contains|continue|cycle|data|deallocate|dimension|do|else|else if|elseif|elsewhere|end|enddo|endfile|endif|entry|equivalence|exit|external|format|function|goto|if|implicit|include|inquire|integer|intent|interface|intrinsic|logical|module|namelist|nullify|only|open|operator|optional|parameter|pause|pointer|print|private|procedure|program|public|read|real|recursive|result|return|rewind|rewrite|save|select|sequence|stop|subroutine|taret|then|use|where|while|write|
[Options]
LineCommentA=C
LineCommentB=!
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstCharA=2
OnlyLineCommentIfFirstCharB=2
String='
StringOnLine=1
Symbols=():*
Numbers=0123456789
[Fold]
1_Id=if
1_Begin=
1_End=endif
1_EndBefore=else
1_Section=
1_NoParentOfId=0
1_NotAlwaysEnded=0
1_ListItem=
2_Id=else
2_Begin=
2_End=endif
2_EndBefore=
2_Section=
2_NoParentOfId=0
2_NotAlwaysEnded=0
2_ListItem=
3_Id=subroutine
3_Begin=
3_End=end
3_EndBefore=
3_Section=
3_NoParentOfId=0
3_NotAlwaysEnded=0
3_ListItem=ceMethod
4_Id=function
4_Begin=
4_End=end
4_EndBefore=
4_Section=
4_NoParentOfId=0
4_NotAlwaysEnded=0
4_ListItem=ceMethod
5_Id=program
5_Begin=
5_End=end
5_EndBefore=
5_Section=
5_NoParentOfId=0
5_NotAlwaysEnded=0
5_ListItem=
I get the highlighting shown in the attached image:
Jeff
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 15:07
by jgodfrey
Wait... Now it's working! I seem to get tripped up by some kind of highlighting cache that I don't understand. I haven't yet found a guaranteed way to know that highlighter changes I just made are being reflected in the file I'm looking at (short of closing TextEd). Sometimes, the highlight seems to refresh automatically. Sometimes changing the file-type selection to something incorrect and then changing it back shows the recent changes. Other times, closing the current file and reopening it shows the changes.
In the case of the above Fortran, I did all of the above, but still (apparently) got the incorrect highlighting. Finally, I closed TextEd and reopened it, then reopened my file - and all is OK.
What's the proper procedure for testing highlighter changes? Do I need to close the editor each time?
Thanks,
Jeff
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 15:13
by jgodfrey
In addition to the above response, Fortran is not case sensitive, and therefore the "C" comment character can be upper or lowercase. Currently, TextEd seems to only recognize a comment as defined (so, uppercase "C"). Maybe the comment parsing should leverage the CaseSensitive flag of the definition file?
Also, technically Fortran 77 allows the following comment characters (C, c, D, d), while Fortran 90 allows only (!). So, ignoring the upper/lower case differences, there are actually 3 comment chars. I don't suppose I can define multiples on in the same definition, can I? Something like "C|D|!".
Looking through the legacy code I support, I see that all 3 are used, though the "D" variation is only in a few places. So, if I can't define them all, it's not a big problem.
Thanks,
Jeff
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 15:23
by Rickard Johansson
Seems you have an extra space after "C"
LineCommentA=C<space>
Just remove it and it should work.
Re: FORTRAN syntax file
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 15:32
by jgodfrey
Rickard Johansson wrote:Seems you have an extra space after "C"
Actually, I thought about that, but I don't think that was the case. Anyway, if you haven't seen my 2 previous responses, you might look at them.
Thanks,
Jeff